Skip to main content

iHeartRadio Hits 60 Million Registered Users


iHeartMedia has today announced that its iHeartRadio streaming music service has surpassed 60 million registered users.

Of course, “registered users” is a vague stat. Spotify now has over 60 million monthly active users and 15 million paying customers. Pandora has over 250 million registered users and had 77 million active users as of mid-2014.

These numbers are tough to compare since iHeartRadio treats users a bit differently than most streaming services. Users can listen to iHeartRadio on their smartphone or on the web for free without ever registering. The app/website essentially connect users to an am/fm radio.

But if users want to listen to playlists or use other, more personalized features on iHeartRadio, they have to register with the service.

Registered user numbers can be misleading because the stat counts people no matter how long ago they registered and whether or not they still use a service. iHeartRadio might have a ton of unregistered users, both the registered ones are necessarily active.

Even the term “monthly active users” has come under fire recently from figures including Medium’s Ev Williams because it doesn’t actually gauge engagement. Someone who uses one app for 10 hours a month would be counted the same as one who stops by for 10 minutes. Daily active users and time-on-site can be more accurate ways of measuring the value created by a service, but some services like Google Search actively try to reduce the amount of time people spend with it to get the same utility.

For music services, listening time is probably the best metric, but few companies reveal it. Pandora had 1.73 billion listening hours per month in May 2014, translating to 22 hours per month for each of its 77 million active users at the time. Spotify say cross-platform users who rock both its mobile and desktop apps rack up an average of 155 minutes of listening per day, or 77 hours per month, but these are its more engaged users.

“We look at registration as a way to gauge the added value we bring to consumers,” said iHeartRadio’s Chief Product Officer Chris Williams. “It goes beyond the convenience we bring with access to terrestrial radio and shows that people want that more refined experience that we can offer.”

iHeartRadio only came on the scene about four years ago, though it uses the resources of a much older institution, its parent company formerly Clear Channel, to power its content.

The streaming space is incredibly hot, though incredibly difficult, going into 2015. Major players have made a name for themselves in a way that has truly changed consumer behavior. Most people will choose a streaming radio product (like Pandora) or a streaming music locker (like Spotify) before they will buy an album outright. But as consumers flock to these new media products, it’s worth remembering that the margins on streaming music are very low.

Plus, there are tons of players in the space, from startups like Pandora and Spotify to bigger players like Apple, Google and Amazon.

But iHeart has a unique position in the mass of competitors. The company is using its history as Clear Channel, one of the world’s largest terrestrial radio providers, to shift into modern-day usage behaviors.

“Speed is our biggest challenge moving forward,” said Williams. “I’m constantly blown away by the technology we have and the ideas that come across my desk, but it’s all about if we can move fast enough to get there while it’s still valuable to consumers and innovative and relevant.”

If iHeartRadio can use its AM and FM stations to cross-promote its site and app, it could translate its massive terrestrial footprint to digital. It already has a strong audio ads teams in place to monetize this. Otherwise, it may see its share of listener time slip to services with more radio personalization or on-demand song choice.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ASUS VivoBook X202E Windows 8 Touchscreen Laptop Review And Giveaway

It wasn’t very long ago when prices of touchscreen Windows 8 laptops soared beyond $1000. Thankfully, those days are behind us, and portable computers can easily be purchased – touchscreen and all – for under $500. That’s precisely the demographic in which the ASUS VivoBook X202E falls. When compared to a high-end laptop, its specifications might seem modest, but for laptop buyers just looking for a way to browse the web, watch videos, use basic apps, and not spend too much money, something in this budget is perfectly suitable. The question is, of course, how does the ASUS VivoBook X202E compare to others on the market, and is it the one which you should be spending your hard-earned money on? Well, you’re just going to have to keep reading to find out. Best of all, we are giving away an ASUS VivoBook X202E to one lucky winner. Keep reading for your chance to take home this Windows 8 touchscreen laptop! Introducing the ASUS VivoBook X202E Laptop The ASUS VivoBook X202...

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 N9000 Review and Giveaway

When it comes to massive phones, nothing is more iconic than the Samsung Galaxy Note. It has gained popularity not only due to its size, but its additional features such as a stylus and a larger battery make it a more useful phone. Samsung released the third generation of the Galaxy Note in October, updating the phablet with a larger screen and improved hardware. Read through our review, then join the giveaway to win the  Samsung Galaxy Note 3 ! Competitors Of course, other Android competitors haven’t let the $640  Galaxy Note 3  be the only player in the phablet market. There are others such as the  Sony Xperia Z Ultra , the Samsung Galaxy Mega , and the other more common phones that are reaching 5″ screens such as the  Samsung Galaxy S4 , the  HTC One , and the  Nexus 5 . Unlike the normal-sized top contenders, the Galaxy Note 3 has a bigger screen and larger battery. It also offers specific features (surrounding the S Pen stylus) th...

Samsung Galaxy S5 Review and Giveaway

Few smartphones are as aggressively marketed as Samsung’s Galaxy S5. The S5 can no longer be considered brand-new — but it  is  Samsung’s flagship, at least for the next few months. With a gorgeous screen, a capable camera, a waterproof build, and a user-replaceable battery, the Galaxy S5 has a lot to offer… at least on paper. Let’s find out how good it really is. What Makes This Review Different There are about a million Galaxy S5 reviews out there. Why should you read this one? Two keys points make our review different: We bought our own device . Unlike many tech blogs, we don’t use a review unit Samsung gave us. We went out to the store and bought one, just like you would. This means everything you read here is truly impartial – we owe Samsung nothing. We used it for more than a month . Some sites rush to be the first to publish a review on a new device. That’s not how we do things. I used the Galaxy S5 as my main (and only) Android phone for nearly two months,...