Skip to main content

Texting Turns 22

Texting Turns 22
This act was considered important enough to mark the occasion with a party but not important enough to invite its author. The truth is, nobody really saw the significance of what they were working on.

Twenty-two years and quadrillions of text messages later, SMS is the king of electronic communications. It makes tens of billions of dollars for network providers and connects billions of people around the world. Annual text traffic is expected to reach 9.4 trillion by 2016.

And why wouldn’t SMS statistics be so impressive? Cheap, effective and widely available, the rude health in which texting finds itself in 2014 was patently obvious in 1992. Or at least that’s what hindsight bias tells us. The truth is a little more complicated…

‘Perfectly Sufficient’

Those twenty characters summed up, with stereotypically Teutonic concision, Friedhelm Hillebrand’s thoughts on the optimal length of the standardized text message protocol he and a dozen colleagues were working on in 1985.

As chairman of the non-voice services committee for the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Hillebrand was tasked with developing a technology capable of transmitting, receiving and displaying text messages. The limited bandwidth available on wireless networks, which at the time were the sole reserve of car phones, meant Hillebrand and his team had to find a data pipeline capable of sending short messages across all cellular carriers and to all mobile phones.

The lightbulb moment came with the idea of harnessing an existing radio channel that was already used to alert cellphones about reception strength. “We were looking [for a] cheap implementation,” said Hillebrand in a 2009 LA Times interview. “Most of the time, nothing happens on this control link… it was free capacity on the system.”

Hillebrand’s ‘perfectly sufficient’ character limit was 160, a number now as standard to electronic communications as 24 frames are to movies, or 12 bars are to blues. The golden number was hit upon after studying word-counts on a decidedly low-tech platform: the humble postcard. Most postcards contain less than 160 characters. It was already an intuitive message-length for people, so it made sense to stick with that limit.

Papworth concurs. “We tested that you could send 160 characters, but who was ever going to send more than 160 characters to say ‘If you’re not home in 20 minutes, your dinner’s in the dog’?’ Especially bearing in mind this was before predictive text,” says Papworth.

An Accidental Success?

The offhand, charmingly humble way in which these world-changing engineers talk about SMS is indicative of the circuitous route it took to market. Projections were about as accurate as the first incarnations of predictive text (not very). Market research was practically non-existent.

When Papworth sent his Yuletide greeting in 1992, the technology had already been in development for seven years. Early GSM handsets did not support SMS, and when they began to, the protocol was only used to inform recipients of a voicemail. It took a further seven years for cross-network SMS to become available.

As hard as it is to fathom in a world of instant startup success, where Instagram is valued at (and bought for) a billion dollars despite never having publicly hinted at a monetization strategy, SMS nearly didn’t happen. It was so slow out of the gate, it threatened to simply give up and head back to the stable.

Read More

Popular posts from this blog

ASUS VivoBook X202E Windows 8 Touchscreen Laptop Review And Giveaway

It wasn’t very long ago when prices of touchscreen Windows 8 laptops soared beyond $1000. Thankfully, those days are behind us, and portable computers can easily be purchased – touchscreen and all – for under $500. That’s precisely the demographic in which the ASUS VivoBook X202E falls. When compared to a high-end laptop, its specifications might seem modest, but for laptop buyers just looking for a way to browse the web, watch videos, use basic apps, and not spend too much money, something in this budget is perfectly suitable. The question is, of course, how does the ASUS VivoBook X202E compare to others on the market, and is it the one which you should be spending your hard-earned money on? Well, you’re just going to have to keep reading to find out. Best of all, we are giving away an ASUS VivoBook X202E to one lucky winner. Keep reading for your chance to take home this Windows 8 touchscreen laptop! Introducing the ASUS VivoBook X202E Laptop The ASUS VivoBook X202...

Samsung Galaxy S5 Review and Giveaway

Few smartphones are as aggressively marketed as Samsung’s Galaxy S5. The S5 can no longer be considered brand-new — but it  is  Samsung’s flagship, at least for the next few months. With a gorgeous screen, a capable camera, a waterproof build, and a user-replaceable battery, the Galaxy S5 has a lot to offer… at least on paper. Let’s find out how good it really is. What Makes This Review Different There are about a million Galaxy S5 reviews out there. Why should you read this one? Two keys points make our review different: We bought our own device . Unlike many tech blogs, we don’t use a review unit Samsung gave us. We went out to the store and bought one, just like you would. This means everything you read here is truly impartial – we owe Samsung nothing. We used it for more than a month . Some sites rush to be the first to publish a review on a new device. That’s not how we do things. I used the Galaxy S5 as my main (and only) Android phone for nearly two months,...

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 N9000 Review and Giveaway

When it comes to massive phones, nothing is more iconic than the Samsung Galaxy Note. It has gained popularity not only due to its size, but its additional features such as a stylus and a larger battery make it a more useful phone. Samsung released the third generation of the Galaxy Note in October, updating the phablet with a larger screen and improved hardware. Read through our review, then join the giveaway to win the  Samsung Galaxy Note 3 ! Competitors Of course, other Android competitors haven’t let the $640  Galaxy Note 3  be the only player in the phablet market. There are others such as the  Sony Xperia Z Ultra , the Samsung Galaxy Mega , and the other more common phones that are reaching 5″ screens such as the  Samsung Galaxy S4 , the  HTC One , and the  Nexus 5 . Unlike the normal-sized top contenders, the Galaxy Note 3 has a bigger screen and larger battery. It also offers specific features (surrounding the S Pen stylus) th...